On September 19, 2025, the Commission for Security and Health Check the Bundesmine for Security and Health Care issued a decision, Labor against Labor against Consol Pennsylvania Coal Companywhich redefined the interpretation of the “significant and essential” (S&S) standards of Section 104 (d) of the federal law on the federal security and health for the federal mines. The standard has to change over the decades. The secretary did not request the S&S test to be checked in the appeal procedure. However, the decision of the Commission revised the test to only (1) to demand a danger to which the violation could contribute, and (2) that the violation contributes significantly and significantly to this danger – which is considerably easier for the Minister of Labor (and the MSHA inspectors) to support and maintain allegations.
Important findings from the decision of the Commission
- The Commission found the Math Do not test processable. The test required four elements to determine whether a violation has contributed significantly and significantly to the cause and effect of the danger: (1) an underlying violation of an obligatory security standard; (2) A discrete security risk by the violation contributed; (3) An appropriate probability to which the danger has contributed will lead to an injury; and (4) a reasonable probability that the injury will be somewhat serious.
- The Commission criticized MathSteps 3 and 4, as they are not supported by the text, and known ambiguities that prompted the courts to change the standard repeatedly. A recent reformulation of the Commission (articulated in Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC) required that the danger that results from the violation led to an injury.
- The Commission emphasized the text of 104 (D) (1), which says ContributionTo a danger. The decisions of the DC circuit in Labor against Labor against Jim Walter Resources And Cumberland Coal Resources v. FMSHRCThe two were of the opinion that only a contribution to the danger was necessary, the interpretation of the Commission further increased. In addition, the commission found the tests Math And Peabody intervenes in the separate “immediately impending dangers” of the mine act.
Go forward
The decision of the Commission lowers the S&S threshold. This shift in interpretation could lead to increased S&S quotes of MSHA inspectors.
The autumn clipper Charlotte Rhoad also helped work out this blog.
[View source.]