Democratic AGs Object to DOL's Risky Reinterpretation of General Duty Clause – Employee Rights/Industrial Relations

Progress Isn't Perfect: Emerging Professional And Technological Risks Facing Contractors And Design Professionals - Technology
Democratic AGs Object to DOL's Risky Reinterpretation of General Duty Clause – Employee Rights/Industrial Relations – United States




CO

Cozen O'Connor


Cozen O'Connor logo

Founded in 1970, Cozen O'Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities in North America and Europe. We are a full-service law firm with award-winning areas of expertise in litigation, business law and government relations. Our lawyers have experience in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse customer list includes global Fortune 500 companies, medium-sized companies with growth potential, ambitious startups and high-profile personalities.


Illinois AG Kwame Raoul was one of the leaders of a group of 11 Democratic AGs and three state labor departments in filing a brief against a U.S. Department of Labor…


United States
Illinois
Employment and HR





To print this article, you simply need to be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.


Cozen O'Connor's articles by Cozen O'Connor are most popular:

  • within the employment and HR topic(s)

Cozen O'Connor's most popular are:

  • within the topics of immigration and taxes
  • with readers from the environmental and waste management as well as the insurance industry
  • Illinois AG Kwame Raoul co-led a group of 11 Democratic AGs and three state labor departments in filing a brief opposing a U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) proposed rule that would limit the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) ability to hold employers accountable for recognized workplace hazards in “inherently risky” employment activities such as live performances, animal training, motorsports and extreme sports under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Law).

  • In its letter, the group argues that the change would result in millions of workers being unlawfully deprived of important federal safety protections, contradicting the clear language and congressional intent of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and decades of case law. The comments also allege that OSHA's proposal is arbitrary and capricious and violates the Administrative Procedures Act, and that the rule's vague provisions could undermine consistent enforcement, cause confusion among employers and regulators, and lead to more workplace injuries.

  • The group urges OSHA to withdraw the proposed rule and continue to recognize workplace hazards in all workplaces, including those that involve inherently risky activities.

  • We previously reported on the Democratic AG's efforts to maintain OSHA protections, including an amicus brief in which 19 AGs defended federal workplace safety standards.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the topic. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your specific circumstances.












See more popular content from


Employment and HR




Contributor



United States












Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy.

Learn more























Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *