Both the Turkish Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar and the “Foreign Ministry” of the north on Tuesday evening expressed broad satisfaction with a European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) about Greek land in Cypriot property in Varosha.
In the case of “KV Mediterranean Tours Limited against Turkiye”, the court used to decide that the government of Turkey had to pay a total of € 18,000 in “non-knowing damage”-the names that were given compensation for losses that are not easily quantifiable and costs and costs.
This happened after the owner of the property originally submitted a lawsuit at the EGRHR in 2005, but was then sent to the real estate commission (IPC) after the ECHR decided that the IPC was an effective domestic resource.
The company had back then returned to the ECHR in 2017 and argued that the procedure in the IPC was excessively delayed.
In addition to the Financial Awards, the court found that the position of the applicant in view of the interest and claims of the north (EVKAF) in Varosha was “impossible” to achieve a domestic solution.
In this matter, the Court said that “apparently there was no concrete decision regarding the ownership of the ownership of the IPC”, and as such, the court cannot speculate in this phase of the procedure before the IPC about its possible result “,
“The IPC did not automatically decide to grant property rights to property rights [Evkaf]But only invited [them] to participate in the procedures In order to be able to take all available information about the property in question, ”it says.
It also added that “the applicant's company was unable to prove how the participation of the EVKAF had made the procedure unfairly”, and that “the IPC kept the authority to examine property claims and that EVKAF did not automatically assign owners”.
In addition, it was said: “The participation of EVKAF in the IPC procedure as an interested party was necessary to meet the principle of a fair negotiation”.
“The question of third -party interventions was not only examined in detail by the IPC, but also by the courts. Accordingly. There is no evidence that such a participation to the injustice led in the entire procedure, ”said it.
In response to the verdict, Tatar said that the ECHR had “confirmed again … that the IPC is an effective domestic appeal that must be exhausted in terms of the demands of Greek Cypriots in relation to the immovable properties that they have given up in the TRNC”.
He added that “the ECHR is underlined that the immovable properties abandoned by the Greek Cypriots in the TRNC are not the only solution and that the compensation or exchange decisions that the IPC can indicate are valid as a compensation method”.
“This EGHR decision is a reaction to the Greek Cypriot side, which ignores our ownership regime and the IPC … and pursues aggressive politics against our people. The IPC exists and is still steadily effective, ”he said.
He then referred to the recent arrests of the Republic of Cyprus of humans.
“We remind the Greek Cypriot side again of their obligation to comply with the ECHR decisions. We demand an immediate end of the oppressive and hostile attitude that aim to act in the context of our ownership regime … what aims to punish them individually and that clearly violates their human rights,” he said.
In the meantime, the “Foreign Ministry” of the north said The judgment had “confirmed that the IPC is an effective home appeal”.
“At this point, we would like to repeat our determination to do what is necessary to ensure that the IPC, which we consider as a guarantee of the ownership regime in our country, effectively continues its work,” it said.