On the city council's agenda for October 7, 2025

The closed session begins at 5 p.m. public can make comments

The city council will hold a closed session to discuss existing legal disputes in connection with cases of orange County Superior Court No. 30-2024-01405276-CL-UD-CJC and No. 30-2024-01401832-CU-CJC. The meetings will be conveyed with the legal assistance in relation to significant domain and inverse conviction with Commonwealth & Harbor LLC, which Mickys Irish Pub and High Horse Saloon operates. The business are in possession From the Marovic family, who acquired the property from the Florentine family in 2018. The closed session aims to control legal strategies and at the same time comply with the confidentiality regulations. You can find another context in the Fullerton Observer report on this matter.

Read: https://fullertonobserver.com/2022/02/planning-commissioners-ay-the-bump-must-go/

The second legal dispute in the closed session: Ralph and Marie Kaneshiro have filed a lawsuit against the city of Fullerton, which was identified as case number OCSC 30-2024-01372395-CU-PA-CJC. The legal dispute concerns personal injury, property damage and illegal death, which results from a motor vehicle accident. Details of the incident are currently limited in the course of the case by the legal system.

There seems to be a third case But The city does not have release The case number or name.

The city council will hold a regular session on October 7, 2025 at 5:30 p.m.With a presentation on the implementation update of the Community Forest Management Plan. To read Articlehttps://fullertonobserver.com/2025/04/community-forest-management-plan-be-presentdo-the-the-city-council-on-october-7/

The city council proposes revisions of noise regulation for commercial areas

The city's noise regulation currently lacks certain decibeling thresholds for trade zones and make the enforcement efforts more difficult. The enforcement of the code has often rely on general harassment regulations that are helpful but to issue measurable noise standards. A review by the Fullerton General Plan in 2012 determined this problem and called for updates to the noise regulation.

The city council instructed the employees to evaluate the situation in 2023, which led to the cessation of an acoustic engineering consultant, which confirmed high noise in commercial areas, especially during the evening. On September 16, 2025, a draft regulation was presented, which led to a revised proposal with specific changes to regulate the noise levels in commercial zones.

The most important features of the revised regulation include:

1. Specific decibel boundaries: The regulation sets measurable decibeling thresholds for noise on the company's property line that generates it, and using one -minute and five -minute intervals for reviews.

2. Entertainment regulations: For the first time, entertaining outdoor entertainment is permitted in these zones from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m., whereby Noise is limited to 80 DBA at the property border. For example, in a main street in Fullerton, normal traffic noises generally fall into the 60 to 70 decibel areabut can increase significantly depending on the volume and type of vehicles.

3 .. Strengthening the enforcement for entertainment permits: Companies with entertainment permits that receive three quotations in 12 months must take a remedial measures with city officials, including the police chief. Persistent violations could lead to operational restrictions or allow the revocation.

4 .. improved enforcement authority: The regulation contains provisions for the city to change or revoke the claims or permits for land use in the event of repeated noise violations.

5. Influence measurement protocols: The measurements are now carried out directly in the property boundary of the business responsible for the noise.

6. Administrative quotes: Although the Council applied for higher fines for violations, state law limits administrative penalties. Instead, the regulation emphasizes extended enforcement instruments to ensure compliance with compliance.

Zoning change

The second point concerns an application to change zoning for real estate at 3400 and 3404 Gregory Avenue. The applicant tries to reconcile these locations from GC (General Commercial) to MG (Manufacturing General) in order to facilitate the development of a veterinary hospital and to ensure the consistency of the name “General Plan Land Use”. A regulation for the first reading of the approval of this zoning change is also presented.

Related